↓ Skip to main content

Randomized clinical trial of the timing it right stroke family support program: research protocol

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (52nd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
33 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
296 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Randomized clinical trial of the timing it right stroke family support program: research protocol
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Jill I Cameron, Gary Naglie, Monique A M Gignac, Mark Bayley, Grace Warner, Theresa Green, Anna Czerwonka, Maria Huijbregts, Frank L Silver, Steve J Phillips, Angela M Cheung

Abstract

Family caregivers provide invaluable support to stroke survivors during their recovery, rehabilitation, and community re-integration. Unfortunately, it is not standard clinical practice to prepare and support caregivers in this role and, as a result, many experience stress and poor health that can compromise stroke survivor recovery and threaten the sustainability of keeping the stroke survivor at home. We developed the Timing it Right Stroke Family Support Program (TIRSFSP) to guide the timing of delivering specific types of education and support to meet caregivers' evolving needs. The objective of this multi-site randomized controlled trial is to determine if delivering the TIRSFSP across the stroke care continuum improves caregivers' sense of being supported and emotional well-being.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 296 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Unknown 293 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 44 15%
Student > Bachelor 37 13%
Researcher 23 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 7%
Student > Postgraduate 13 4%
Other 50 17%
Unknown 108 36%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 65 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 36 12%
Psychology 27 9%
Social Sciences 15 5%
Neuroscience 13 4%
Other 22 7%
Unknown 118 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 December 2019.
All research outputs
#12,602,542
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#4,076
of 7,613 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#151,396
of 304,598 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#55
of 117 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,613 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 304,598 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 49th percentile – i.e., 49% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 117 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.