↓ Skip to main content

Perception of pain and distress in intubated and mechanically ventilated newborn infants by parents and health professionals

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pediatrics, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
6 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
62 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Perception of pain and distress in intubated and mechanically ventilated newborn infants by parents and health professionals
Published in
BMC Pediatrics, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2431-14-44
Pubmed ID
Authors

Luciana Sabatini Doto Tannous Elias, Amélia Miyashiro Nunes dos Santos, Ruth Guinsburg

Abstract

An understanding of perceptions of parents and health caregivers who assist critically ill neonates is necessary to comprehend their actions and demands. Therefore this study aim to analyze the agreement among parents, nurse technicians and pediatricians regarding the presence and intensity of pain and distress in mechanically ventilated and intubated newborn infants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 62 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Brazil 1 2%
Unknown 61 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 12 19%
Student > Bachelor 11 18%
Other 6 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 10%
Researcher 3 5%
Other 10 16%
Unknown 14 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 21 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 18 29%
Psychology 2 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 1 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Other 4 6%
Unknown 15 24%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,365,132
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#2,344
of 2,988 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#251,057
of 336,463 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#42
of 53 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,988 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.6. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 336,463 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 53 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.