↓ Skip to main content

How can technology enhance cognitive behavioral therapy: the case of pediatric obsessive compulsive disorder

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Psychiatry, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
121 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How can technology enhance cognitive behavioral therapy: the case of pediatric obsessive compulsive disorder
Published in
BMC Psychiatry, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12888-017-1377-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lidewij H. Wolters, Vivian op de Beek, Bernhard Weidle, Norbert Skokauskas

Abstract

Many children with mental health disorders do not receive adequate treatment due to the uneven dissemination of resources, and other barriers to treatment. In the case of pediatric obsessive compulsive disorder treatment progress is also hindered by partial or non-response to treatment in addition to poor compliance. This debate paper focuses on new technologies as a potential vehicle to address the challenges faced by traditional treatment, with special reference to cognitive behavioral therapy for pediatric obsessive compulsive disorder. We discuss the achievements and challenges that previous studies have faced, debate ways to overcome them, and we offer specific suggestions for further research in the area.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 121 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 121 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 20 17%
Student > Master 19 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 18 15%
Researcher 9 7%
Student > Postgraduate 4 3%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 41 34%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 32 26%
Medicine and Dentistry 11 9%
Computer Science 9 7%
Nursing and Health Professions 7 6%
Neuroscience 3 2%
Other 16 13%
Unknown 43 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2023.
All research outputs
#4,263,735
of 24,946,857 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,669
of 5,297 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,394
of 321,832 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#34
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,946,857 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,297 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,832 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.