Title |
In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-52 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Glenda Hawley, Tina Janamian, Claire Jackson, Shelley A Wilkinson |
Abstract |
The paper hand-held record (PHR) has been widely used as a tool to facilitate communication between health care providers and a pregnant woman. Since its inception in the 1950s, it has been described as a successful initiative, evolving to meet the needs of communities and their providers. Increasingly, the electronic health record (EHR) has dominated the healthcare arena and the maternity general practice shared-care arrangement seems to have adopted this initiative. A systematic review was conducted to determine perspectives of the PHR and the EHR with regards to data completeness; experiences of users and integration of care between women and health care providers. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Argentina | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 2 | 1% |
New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 155 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 34 | 21% |
Researcher | 19 | 12% |
Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 9% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 10 | 6% |
Other | 26 | 16% |
Unknown | 40 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 53 | 33% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 16 | 10% |
Computer Science | 10 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 10 | 6% |
Engineering | 10 | 6% |
Other | 16 | 10% |
Unknown | 44 | 28% |