↓ Skip to main content

In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Readers on

mendeley
159 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
In a maternity shared-care environment, what do we know about the paper hand-held and electronic health record: a systematic literature review
Published in
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, January 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2393-14-52
Pubmed ID
Authors

Glenda Hawley, Tina Janamian, Claire Jackson, Shelley A Wilkinson

Abstract

The paper hand-held record (PHR) has been widely used as a tool to facilitate communication between health care providers and a pregnant woman. Since its inception in the 1950s, it has been described as a successful initiative, evolving to meet the needs of communities and their providers. Increasingly, the electronic health record (EHR) has dominated the healthcare arena and the maternity general practice shared-care arrangement seems to have adopted this initiative. A systematic review was conducted to determine perspectives of the PHR and the EHR with regards to data completeness; experiences of users and integration of care between women and health care providers.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 2 1%
New Zealand 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Unknown 155 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 34 21%
Researcher 19 12%
Student > Bachelor 16 10%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 6%
Other 26 16%
Unknown 40 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 53 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 16 10%
Computer Science 10 6%
Social Sciences 10 6%
Engineering 10 6%
Other 16 10%
Unknown 44 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,672,608
of 23,573,357 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#1,844
of 4,333 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,093
of 311,218 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#63
of 106 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,573,357 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 70th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,333 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,218 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 106 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.