↓ Skip to main content

Using the intervention mapping protocol to reduce European preschoolers’ sedentary behavior, an application to the ToyBox-Study

Overview of attention for article published in International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
9 X users

Readers on

mendeley
201 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Using the intervention mapping protocol to reduce European preschoolers’ sedentary behavior, an application to the ToyBox-Study
Published in
International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1479-5868-11-19
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ellen De Decker, Marieke De Craemer, Ilse De Bourdeaudhuij, Vera Verbestel, Kristin Duvinage, Violeta Iotova, Evangelia Grammatikaki, Andreas Wildgruber, Theodora Mouratidou, Yannis Manios, Greet Cardon

Abstract

High levels of sedentary behavior are often measured in preschoolers, but only a few interventions have been developed to counteract this. Furthermore, detailed descriptions of interventions in preschoolers targeting different forms of sedentary behavior could not be located in the literature. The aim of the present paper was to describe the different steps of the Intervention Mapping Protocol used towards the development of an intervention component of the ToyBox-study focusing on decreasing preschoolers' sedentary behavior. The ToyBox-study focuses on the prevention of overweight in 4- to 6-year-old children by implementing a multi-component kindergarten-based intervention with family involvement in six different European countries.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 201 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Spain 1 <1%
Netherlands 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 197 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 33 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 25 12%
Researcher 20 10%
Student > Bachelor 19 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 17 8%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 50 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 30 15%
Nursing and Health Professions 27 13%
Psychology 25 12%
Social Sciences 23 11%
Sports and Recreations 15 7%
Other 22 11%
Unknown 59 29%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 July 2016.
All research outputs
#6,963,279
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#1,551
of 2,116 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#63,026
of 238,955 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Behavioral Nutrition and Physical Activity
#34
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,116 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,955 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.