You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A complex intervention to improve pregnancy outcome in obese women; the UPBEAT randomised controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2393-14-74 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Annette L Briley, Suzanne Barr, Shirlene Badger, Ruth Bell, Helen Croker, Keith M Godfrey, Bridget Holmes, Tarja I Kinnunen, Scott M Nelson, Eugene Oteng-Ntim, Nashita Patel, Stephen C Robson, Jane Sandall, Thomas Sanders, Naveed Sattar, Paul T Seed, Jane Wardle, Lucilla Poston |
| Abstract |
Despite the widespread recognition that obesity in pregnant women is associated with adverse outcomes for mother and child, there is no intervention proven to reduce the risk of these complications. The primary aim of this randomised controlled trial is to assess in obese pregnant women, whether a complex behavioural intervention, based on changing diet (to foods with a lower glycemic index) and physical activity, will reduce the risk of gestational diabetes (GDM) and delivery of a large for gestational age (LGA) infant. A secondary aim is to determine whether the intervention lowers the long term risk of obesity in the offspring. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 507 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 2 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Luxembourg | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 498 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 86 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 65 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 64 | 13% |
| Researcher | 50 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 25 | 5% |
| Other | 75 | 15% |
| Unknown | 142 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 136 | 27% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 60 | 12% |
| Psychology | 31 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 25 | 5% |
| Sports and Recreations | 24 | 5% |
| Other | 69 | 14% |
| Unknown | 162 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 February 2014.
All research outputs
#18,365,132
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#3,452
of 4,172 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#163,627
of 223,888 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
#107
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,172 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.8. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,888 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.