↓ Skip to main content

Role of adult neurogenesis in hippocampal-cortical memory consolidation

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Brain, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
patent
2 patents
facebook
5 Facebook pages
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
74 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
210 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Role of adult neurogenesis in hippocampal-cortical memory consolidation
Published in
Molecular Brain, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1756-6606-7-13
Pubmed ID
Authors

Takashi Kitamura, Kaoru Inokuchi

Abstract

Acquired memory is initially dependent on the hippocampus (HPC) for permanent memory formation. This hippocampal dependency of memory recall progressively decays with time, a process that is associated with a gradual increase in dependency upon cortical structures. This process is commonly referred to as systems consolidation theory. In this paper, we first review how memory becomes hippocampal dependent to cortical dependent with an emphasis on the interactions that occur between the HPC and cortex during systems consolidation. We also review the mechanisms underlying the gradual decay of HPC dependency during systems consolidation from the perspective of memory erasures by adult hippocampal neurogenesis. Finally, we discuss the relationship between systems consolidation and memory precision.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 210 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 4 2%
France 2 <1%
Germany 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Poland 1 <1%
Unknown 201 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 46 22%
Student > Bachelor 35 17%
Student > Master 31 15%
Researcher 21 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 16 8%
Other 37 18%
Unknown 24 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 57 27%
Neuroscience 55 26%
Psychology 25 12%
Medicine and Dentistry 19 9%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 10 5%
Other 14 7%
Unknown 30 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 June 2023.
All research outputs
#4,261,992
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Brain
#236
of 1,198 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#40,542
of 238,952 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Brain
#5
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,198 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,952 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.