You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Maternal dietary intake of nitrates, nitrites and nitrosamines and selected birth defects in offspring: a case-control study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nutrition Journal, March 2013
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1475-2891-12-34 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
John C Huber, Jean D Brender, Qi Zheng, Joseph R Sharkey, Ann M Vuong, Mayura U Shinde, John S Griesenbeck, Lucina Suarez, Peter H Langlois, Mark A Canfield, Paul A Romitti, Peter J Weyer, the National Birth Defects Prevention Study |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Colombia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 90 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 14 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 10 | 11% |
| Unknown | 28 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 22 | 24% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 9% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 7 | 8% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
| Psychology | 6 | 7% |
| Other | 15 | 16% |
| Unknown | 27 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 May 2021.
All research outputs
#3,115,307
of 24,554,073 outputs
Outputs from Nutrition Journal
#637
of 1,473 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#25,211
of 201,311 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nutrition Journal
#16
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,554,073 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,473 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 39.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 201,311 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.