You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Study Protocol for a randomized controlled trial of mentalization based therapy against specialist supportive clinical management in patients with both eating disorders and symptoms of borderline personality disorder
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Psychiatry, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-244x-14-51 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Paul Robinson, Barbara Barrett, Anthony Bateman, Az Hakeem, Jennifer Hellier, Fenella Lemonsky, Clare Rutterford, Ulrike Schmidt, Peter Fonagy |
| Abstract |
The NOURISHED study: Nice OUtcomes for Referrals with Impulsivity, Self Harm and Eating Disorders.Eating Disorders (ED) and Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD) are both difficult to treat and the combination presents particular challenges. Both are associated with vulnerability to loss of mentalization (awareness of one's own and others' emotional state). In BPD, Mentalization Based therapy (MBT) has been found effective in reducing symptoms. In this trial we investigate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of MBT adapted for Eating disorders (Mentalization Based Therapy for Eating Disorders (MBT-ED)) compared to a standard comparison treatment, Specialist Supportive Clinical Management (SSCM-ED) in patients with a combination of an Eating Disorder and either a diagnosis of BPD or a history of self-harm and impulsivity in the previous 12 months. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 22% |
| Spain | 2 | 22% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 11% |
| Unknown | 4 | 44% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 7 | 78% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 22% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 322 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Spain | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 318 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unspecified | 73 | 23% |
| Student > Master | 37 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 35 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 32 | 10% |
| Researcher | 29 | 9% |
| Other | 45 | 14% |
| Unknown | 71 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 108 | 34% |
| Unspecified | 73 | 23% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 10 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 29 | 9% |
| Unknown | 71 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#3,896,773
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Psychiatry
#1,409
of 4,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#39,580
of 224,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Psychiatry
#24
of 80 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 80 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.