↓ Skip to main content

Relationship between knee osteoarthritis and meniscal shape in observation of Japanese patients by using magnetic resonance imaging

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
17 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
43 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Relationship between knee osteoarthritis and meniscal shape in observation of Japanese patients by using magnetic resonance imaging
Published in
Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13018-017-0595-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Tsuneo Kawahara, Takahisa Sasho, Joe Katsuragi, Takashi Ohnishi, Hideaki Haneishi

Abstract

The aims of this study were to reveal the characteristics of the meniscal shape at each knee osteoarthritis (OA) severity level and to predict trends or patterns of the meniscal shape change as associated with knee OA progression. Fifty-one patients diagnosed with knee OA based on X-ray and magnetic resonance (MR) images were evaluated. They were divided into three groups based on the Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grade: normal group (KL grade of 0 or 1), mild group (KL grade of 2 or 3), and severe group (KL grade of 4). We measured the patients' meniscal size and meniscal extrusion using MR images. In addition, semiquantitative measurement was performed using MR images to determine the arthritic status of the corresponding compartment using a whole-organ magnetic resonance imaging score (WORMS). The longitudinal diameter and posterior wedge angle of the medial meniscus were significantly larger, and the posterior wedge width of the medial meniscus was significantly smaller in the severe group than in the normal group. The WORMS scores for cartilage and osteophytes in the medial region were significantly different among the groups. The WORMS score of each region was strongly correlated with the longitudinal diameter. The WORMS scores of the lateral region were lower than those of the medial region. Our observation of the shape change of the medial meniscus in the posterior region was roughly consistent with that in many previous studies of meniscal degeneration. On the other hand, we saw that the most relevant relation between the progression of the knee OA and the deformation of the meniscus was in the longitudinal direction.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 43 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 43 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 14%
Student > Master 4 9%
Student > Postgraduate 3 7%
Student > Bachelor 3 7%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 12 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 33%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 12%
Engineering 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 2%
Psychology 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 17 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 June 2017.
All research outputs
#18,556,449
of 22,982,639 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#964
of 1,397 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#241,349
of 315,536 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Orthopaedic Surgery and Research
#25
of 46 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,982,639 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,397 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 315,536 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 46 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.