You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Dental care resistance prevention and antibiotic prescribing modification—the cluster-randomised controlled DREAM trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
Implementation Science, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-27 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Christin Löffler, Femke Böhmer, Anne Hornung, Hermann Lang, Ulrike Burmeister, Andreas Podbielski, Anja Wollny, Günther Kundt, Attila Altiner |
Abstract |
Bacterial resistance development is one of the most urgent problems in healthcare worldwide. In Europe, dentistry accounts for a comparatively high amount of antibiotic prescriptions. In light of increasing levels of bacterial resistance, this development is alarming. So far, very few interventional studies have been performed, and further research is urgently needed. By means of a complex educational intervention, the DREAM trial aims at optimising antibiotic prescribing behaviour of general dentists in Germany. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 14% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 14% |
Unknown | 5 | 71% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 43% |
Members of the public | 2 | 29% |
Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Mexico | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 161 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
Researcher | 18 | 11% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 13 | 8% |
Student > Bachelor | 12 | 7% |
Other | 37 | 23% |
Unknown | 42 | 26% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 75 | 46% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 4% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Psychology | 4 | 2% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 2% |
Other | 19 | 12% |
Unknown | 48 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 February 2014.
All research outputs
#6,132,183
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,059
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,182
of 224,804 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#23
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,804 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 36th percentile – i.e., 36% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.