↓ Skip to main content

“Home is where the patient is”: a qualitative analysis of a patient-centred model of care for multi-drug resistant tuberculosis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Health Services Research, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (79th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (76th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
10 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
51 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
247 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
“Home is where the patient is”: a qualitative analysis of a patient-centred model of care for multi-drug resistant tuberculosis
Published in
BMC Health Services Research, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6963-14-81
Pubmed ID
Authors

Shona Horter, Beverley Stringer, Lucy Reynolds, Muhammad Shoaib, Samuel Kasozi, Esther C Casas, Meggy Verputten, Philipp du Cros

Abstract

Ambulatory, community-based care for multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB) has been found to be effective in multiple settings with high cure rates. However, little is known about patient preferences around models of MDR-TB care. Médecins Sans Frontières (MSF) has delivered home-based MDR-TB treatment in the rural Kitgum and Lamwo districts of northern Uganda since 2009 in collaboration with the Ministry of Health and the National TB and Leprosy Programme. We conducted a qualitative study examining the experience of patients and key stakeholders of home-based MDR-TB treatment.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 10 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Malaysia 1 <1%
Sierra Leone 1 <1%
India 1 <1%
Unknown 241 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 57 23%
Researcher 38 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 22 9%
Student > Bachelor 21 9%
Other 12 5%
Other 40 16%
Unknown 57 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 72 29%
Nursing and Health Professions 50 20%
Social Sciences 20 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 3%
Business, Management and Accounting 6 2%
Other 26 11%
Unknown 65 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2014.
All research outputs
#4,697,021
of 23,842,189 outputs
Outputs from BMC Health Services Research
#2,175
of 7,928 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#45,520
of 226,605 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Health Services Research
#32
of 134 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,842,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,928 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,605 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 134 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.