↓ Skip to main content

NicE-seq: high resolution open chromatin profiling

Overview of attention for article published in Genome Biology, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (80th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
73 X users
patent
9 patents

Citations

dimensions_citation
44 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
173 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
NicE-seq: high resolution open chromatin profiling
Published in
Genome Biology, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13059-017-1247-6
Pubmed ID
Authors

V. K. Chaithanya Ponnaluri, Guoqiang Zhang, Pierre-Olivier Estève, George Spracklin, Stephanie Sian, Shuang-yong Xu, Touati Benoukraf, Sriharsa Pradhan

Abstract

Open chromatin profiling integrates information across diverse regulatory elements to reveal the transcriptionally active genome. Tn5 transposase and DNase I sequencing-based methods prefer native or high cell numbers. Here, we describe NicE-seq (nicking enzyme assisted sequencing) for high-resolution open chromatin profiling on both native and formaldehyde-fixed cells. NicE-seq captures and reveals open chromatin sites (OCSs) and transcription factor occupancy at single nucleotide resolution, coincident with DNase hypersensitive and ATAC-seq sites at a low sequencing burden. OCSs correlate with RNA polymerase II occupancy and active chromatin marks, while displaying a contrasting pattern to CpG methylation. Decitabine-mediated hypomethylation of HCT116 displays higher numbers of OCSs.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 73 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 173 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Unknown 172 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 45 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 44 25%
Student > Master 17 10%
Other 12 7%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 4%
Other 26 15%
Unknown 22 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 73 42%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 49 28%
Medicine and Dentistry 8 5%
Computer Science 4 2%
Chemistry 4 2%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 23 13%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 46. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2024.
All research outputs
#925,503
of 25,732,188 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#625
of 4,509 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,728
of 329,317 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#12
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,732,188 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 96th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,509 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,317 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.