↓ Skip to main content

cART prescription trends in a prospective HIV cohort in rural Tanzania from 2007 to 2011

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
8 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
cART prescription trends in a prospective HIV cohort in rural Tanzania from 2007 to 2011
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-14-90
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fabian Christoph Franzeck, Emilio Letang, Geoffrey Mwaigomole, Boniphace Jullu, Tracy R Glass, Daniel Nyogea, Christoph Hatz, Marcel Tanner, Manuel Battegay

Abstract

Since 2010, World Health Organization (WHO) guidelines discourage using stavudine in first-line regimens due to frequent and severe side effects. This study describes the implementation of this recommendation and trends in usage of antiretroviral therapy combinations in a cohort of HIV-positive patients in rural Tanzania.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Tanzania, United Republic of 1 2%
Unknown 41 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 11 26%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 19%
Student > Master 3 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Lecturer 2 5%
Other 6 14%
Unknown 10 24%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 12 29%
Social Sciences 4 10%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 5%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Computer Science 2 5%
Other 4 10%
Unknown 16 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 March 2014.
All research outputs
#14,775,080
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,059
of 7,663 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#128,523
of 224,155 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#83
of 153 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,663 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 224,155 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 40th percentile – i.e., 40% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 153 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.