↓ Skip to main content

Health care professionals’ perceptions towards lifelong learning in palliative care for general practitioners: a focus group study

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Primary Care, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
21 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
134 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Health care professionals’ perceptions towards lifelong learning in palliative care for general practitioners: a focus group study
Published in
BMC Primary Care, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2296-15-36
Pubmed ID
Authors

Peter Pype, Linda Symons, Johan Wens, Bart Van den Eynden, Ann Stes, Myriam Deveugele

Abstract

There is a growing need for palliative care. The majority of palliative patients prefer their general practitioner (GP) to organize their palliative home care. General practitioners need a range of competences to perform this task. However, there has been no general description so far of how GPs keep these competences up-to-date. The present study explores current experiences, views and preferences towards training and education in palliative care among GPs, palliative home-care professionals and professionals from organizations who provide training and education.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 134 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Brazil 1 <1%
Unknown 132 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 25 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 10%
Researcher 11 8%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Other 10 7%
Other 28 21%
Unknown 35 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 45 34%
Nursing and Health Professions 26 19%
Social Sciences 8 6%
Psychology 6 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 9 7%
Unknown 38 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 December 2015.
All research outputs
#14,388,865
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Primary Care
#1,232
of 2,359 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#116,589
of 238,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Primary Care
#27
of 50 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 42nd percentile – i.e., 42% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,359 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.7. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 50 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.