You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Mental health services conceptualised as complex adaptive systems: what can be learned?
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
International Journal of Mental Health Systems, June 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13033-017-0150-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Louise A. Ellis, Kate Churruca, Jeffrey Braithwaite |
| Abstract |
Despite many attempts at promoting systems integration, seamless care, and partnerships among service providers and users, mental health services internationally continue to be fragmented and piecemeal. We exploit recent ideas from complexity science to conceptualise mental health services as complex adaptive systems (CASs). The core features of CASs are described and Australia's headspace initiative is used as an example of the kinds of problems currently being faced. We argue that adopting a CAS lens can transform services, creating more connected care for service users with mental health conditions. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 1 | 13% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 13% |
| Mexico | 1 | 13% |
| Ghana | 1 | 13% |
| South Africa | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 50% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 81 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 24 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 15 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 13% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 10% |
| Psychology | 8 | 10% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 11 | 13% |
| Unknown | 25 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 February 2020.
All research outputs
#6,273,343
of 25,311,095 outputs
Outputs from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#352
of 753 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#90,163
of 321,563 outputs
Outputs of similar age from International Journal of Mental Health Systems
#6
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,311,095 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 753 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 321,563 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 4 of them.