↓ Skip to main content

FISH Amyloid – a new method for finding amyloidogenic segments in proteins based on site specific co-occurence of aminoacids

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (67th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (57th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
73 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
88 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
FISH Amyloid – a new method for finding amyloidogenic segments in proteins based on site specific co-occurence of aminoacids
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2105-15-54
Pubmed ID
Authors

Pawel Gasior, Malgorzata Kotulska

Abstract

Amyloids are proteins capable of forming fibrils whose intramolecular contact sites assume densely packed zipper pattern. Their oligomers can underlie serious diseases, e.g. Alzheimer's and Parkinson's diseases. Recent studies show that short segments of aminoacids can be responsible for amyloidogenic properties of a protein. A few hundreds of such peptides have been experimentally found but experimental testing of all candidates is currently not feasible. Here we propose an original machine learning method for classification of aminoacid sequences, based on discovering a segment with a discriminative pattern of site-specific co-occurrences between sequence elements. The pattern is based on the positions of residues with correlated occurrence over a sliding window of a specified length. The algorithm first recognizes the most relevant training segment in each positive training instance. Then the classification is based on maximal distances between co-occurrence matrix of the relevant segments in positive training sequences and the matrix from negative training segments. The method was applied for studying sequences of aminoacids with regard to their amyloidogenic properties.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 88 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Chile 1 1%
United States 1 1%
Germany 1 1%
Unknown 85 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 32%
Researcher 14 16%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Other 4 5%
Other 15 17%
Unknown 14 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 28 32%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 10 11%
Engineering 7 8%
Computer Science 6 7%
Neuroscience 5 6%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 15 17%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 December 2021.
All research outputs
#7,196,997
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#2,858
of 7,268 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,937
of 223,229 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#44
of 113 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,268 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 59% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,229 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 113 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.