The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review of effects on biodiversity from oil palm production
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-2382-3-4 |
| Authors |
Sini Savilaakso, Claude Garcia, John Garcia-Ulloa, Jaboury Ghazoul, Martha Groom, Manuel R Guariguata, Yves Laumonier, Robert Nasi, Gillian Petrokofsky, Jake Snaddon, Michal Zrust |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3% |
| Indonesia | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 78% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 25 | 78% |
| Scientists | 5 | 16% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 442 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 427 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 82 | 19% |
| Researcher | 82 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 78 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 56 | 13% |
| Other | 15 | 3% |
| Other | 51 | 12% |
| Unknown | 78 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 174 | 39% |
| Environmental Science | 95 | 21% |
| Social Sciences | 10 | 2% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 10 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 48 | 11% |
| Unknown | 96 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2024.
All research outputs
#591,889
of 26,312,176 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#12
of 340 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#5,148
of 235,873 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#1
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,312,176 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 340 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,873 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them