You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Twitter Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Systematic review of effects on biodiversity from oil palm production
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Environmental Evidence, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2047-2382-3-4 |
| Authors |
Sini Savilaakso, Claude Garcia, John Garcia-Ulloa, Jaboury Ghazoul, Martha Groom, Manuel R Guariguata, Yves Laumonier, Robert Nasi, Gillian Petrokofsky, Jake Snaddon, Michal Zrust |
Twitter Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 32 tweeters who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 9% |
| Australia | 2 | 6% |
| Indonesia | 2 | 6% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 6% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3% |
| Canada | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 21 | 66% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 26 | 81% |
| Scientists | 4 | 13% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 421 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 3 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| Malaysia | 2 | <1% |
| Indonesia | 2 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Portugal | 1 | <1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Colombia | 1 | <1% |
| Singapore | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 406 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 79 | 19% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 78 | 19% |
| Student > Master | 76 | 18% |
| Student > Bachelor | 54 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 3% |
| Other | 52 | 12% |
| Unknown | 68 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 170 | 40% |
| Environmental Science | 93 | 22% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 9 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 9 | 2% |
| Other | 50 | 12% |
| Unknown | 81 | 19% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 76. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2021.
All research outputs
#532,095
of 24,500,598 outputs
Outputs from Environmental Evidence
#12
of 316 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,887
of 226,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Environmental Evidence
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,500,598 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 316 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,206 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.