↓ Skip to main content

Nonenhanced MR angiography of the pulmonary arteries using single-shot radial quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS): a technical feasibility study

Overview of attention for article published in Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
11 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
37 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
36 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Nonenhanced MR angiography of the pulmonary arteries using single-shot radial quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS): a technical feasibility study
Published in
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, June 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12968-017-0365-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Robert R. Edelman, Robert I. Silvers, Kiran H. Thakrar, Mark D. Metzl, Jose Nazari, Shivraman Giri, Ioannis Koktzoglou

Abstract

For evaluation of the pulmonary arteries in patients suspected of pulmonary embolism, CT angiography (CTA) is the first-line imaging test with contrast-enhanced MR angiography (CEMRA) a potential alternative. Disadvantages of CTA include exposure to ionizing radiation and an iodinated contrast agent, while CEMRA is sensitive to respiratory motion and requires a gadolinium-based contrast agent. The primary goal of our technical feasibility study was to evaluate pulmonary arterial conspicuity using breath-hold and free-breathing implementations of a recently-developed nonenhanced approach, single-shot radial quiescent-interval slice-selective (QISS) MRA. Breath-hold and free-breathing, navigator-gated versions of radial QISS MRA were evaluated at 1.5 Tesla in three healthy subjects and 11 patients without pulmonary embolism or arterial occlusion by CTA. Images were scored by three readers for conspicuity of the pulmonary arteries through the level of the segmental branches. In addition, one patient with pulmonary embolism was imaged. Scan time for a 54-slice acquisition spanning the pulmonary arteries was less than 2 minutes for breath-hold QISS, and less than 3.4 min using free-breathing QISS. Pulmonary artery branches through the segmental level were conspicuous with either approach. Free-breathing scans showed only mild blurring compared with breath-hold scans. For both readers, less than 1% of pulmonary arterial segments were rated as "not seen" for breath-hold and navigator-gated QISS, respectively. In subjects with atrial fibrillation, single-shot radial QISS consistently depicted the pulmonary artery branches, whereas navigator-gated 3D balanced steady-state free precession showed motion artifacts. In one patient with pulmonary embolism, radial QISS demonstrated central pulmonary emboli comparably to CEMRA and CTA. The thrombi were highly conspicuous on radial QISS images, but appeared subtle and were not prospectively identified on scout images acquired using a single-shot bSSFP acquisition. In this technical feasibility study, both breath-hold and free-breathing single-shot radial QISS MRA enabled rapid, consistent demonstration of the pulmonary arteries through the level of the segmental branches, with only minimal artifacts from respiratory motion and cardiac arrhythmias. Based on these promising initial results, further evaluation in patients with suspected pulmonary embolism appears warranted.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 36 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 6 17%
Student > Master 6 17%
Professor 3 8%
Student > Bachelor 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 6 17%
Unknown 9 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 39%
Engineering 3 8%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 6%
Physics and Astronomy 2 6%
Neuroscience 2 6%
Other 2 6%
Unknown 11 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2022.
All research outputs
#5,530,797
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#386
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#87,794
of 328,407 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#12
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 328,407 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.