The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
As of 1 July 2024, you may notice a temporary increase in the numbers of X profiles with Unknown location. Click here to learn more.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Burnout in intensive care units - a consideration of the possible prevalence and frequency of new risk factors: a descriptive correlational multicentre study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Anesthesiology, October 2013
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-2253-13-38 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Carla Teixeira, Orquídea Ribeiro, António Manuel Fonseca, Ana Sofia Carvalho |
Abstract |
The provision of Intensive Care (IC) can lead to a health care provider's physical, psychological and emotional exhaustion, which may develop into burnout. We notice the absence of specific studies regarding this syndrome in Portuguese Intensive Care Units (ICUs). Our main objective is to study the incidence and risk factors of burnout in Portuguese ICUs. |
X Demographics
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Argentina | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 3 | 60% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 3 | 60% |
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 270 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Indonesia | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
Portugal | 1 | <1% |
Canada | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 266 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 46 | 17% |
Student > Postgraduate | 35 | 13% |
Student > Bachelor | 33 | 12% |
Researcher | 20 | 7% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 18 | 7% |
Other | 56 | 21% |
Unknown | 62 | 23% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 97 | 36% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 17% |
Psychology | 21 | 8% |
Social Sciences | 7 | 3% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 5 | 2% |
Other | 28 | 10% |
Unknown | 65 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 June 2019.
All research outputs
#3,346,315
of 26,105,177 outputs
Outputs from BMC Anesthesiology
#98
of 1,746 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,418
of 227,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Anesthesiology
#1
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,105,177 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,746 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 227,616 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.