↓ Skip to main content

Monitoring of gas station attendants exposure to benzene, toluene, xylene (BTX) using three-color chromosome painting

Overview of attention for article published in Molecular Cytogenetics, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#18 of 402)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (90th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
12 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
39 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
85 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Monitoring of gas station attendants exposure to benzene, toluene, xylene (BTX) using three-color chromosome painting
Published in
Molecular Cytogenetics, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1755-8166-7-15
Pubmed ID
Authors

Fábio Santiago, Gilda Alves, Ubirani Barros Otero, Marianne Medeiros Tabalipa, Luciano Rios Scherrer, Nadezda Kosyakova, Maria Helena Ornellas, Thomas Liehr

Abstract

Chronic exposure of BTX (benzene, toluene, xylene) may lead to progressive degeneration of bone marrow, aplastic anemia and/or leukemia. In Brazil there is no self-service fuel in gas stations and attendants fill the fuel themselves. Due to this they are chronically exposed to high concentration of BTX. Occupational exposure to benzene has been associated with increased chromosomal aberrations in peripheral blood lymphocytes. Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) using whole chromosome painting (wcp) probes allows the rapid detection of chromosomal aberration. In the present study three-color wcp probes for chromosomes 1, 2 and 4 were used for monitoring 60 gas station attendants.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 85 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 85 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 21 25%
Student > Bachelor 15 18%
Researcher 7 8%
Other 6 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 7%
Other 12 14%
Unknown 18 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Environmental Science 9 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 6 7%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 6%
Other 20 24%
Unknown 19 22%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 August 2019.
All research outputs
#3,355,610
of 23,344,526 outputs
Outputs from Molecular Cytogenetics
#18
of 402 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#34,328
of 222,427 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Molecular Cytogenetics
#1
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,344,526 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 402 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.4. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,427 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them