You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
The effect of a decision aid intervention on decision making about coronary heart disease risk reduction: secondary analyses of a randomized trial
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making, February 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6947-14-14 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Stacey L Sheridan, Lindy B Draeger, Michael P Pignone, Barbara Rimer, Shrikant I Bangdiwala, Jianwen Cai, Ziya Gizlice, Thomas C Keyserling, Ross J Simpson |
Abstract |
Decision aids offer promise as a practical solution to improve patient decision making about coronary heart disease (CHD) prevention medications and help patients choose medications to which they are likely to adhere. However, little data is available on decision aids designed to promote adherence. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
India | 1 | 33% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 67% |
Members of the public | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 82 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
Spain | 1 | 1% |
Unknown | 80 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 13 | 16% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 12 | 15% |
Student > Master | 9 | 11% |
Student > Bachelor | 6 | 7% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 6% |
Other | 17 | 21% |
Unknown | 20 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 29 | 35% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 9 | 11% |
Psychology | 7 | 9% |
Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 23 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 March 2015.
All research outputs
#6,269,301
of 22,745,803 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#586
of 1,985 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#59,727
of 221,024 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making
#8
of 29 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,745,803 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,985 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,024 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 29 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.