↓ Skip to main content

Key considerations for the experimental training and evaluation of cancer odour detection dogs: lessons learnt from a double-blind, controlled trial of prostate cancer detection

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Urology, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#24 of 857)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (94th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (88th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
2 news outlets
blogs
1 blog
twitter
9 X users
facebook
2 Facebook pages

Readers on

mendeley
181 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Key considerations for the experimental training and evaluation of cancer odour detection dogs: lessons learnt from a double-blind, controlled trial of prostate cancer detection
Published in
BMC Urology, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2490-14-22
Pubmed ID
Authors

Kevin R Elliker, Barbara A Sommerville, Donald M Broom, David E Neal, Sarah Armstrong, Hywel C Williams

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 9 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 181 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 1%
Japan 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
Australia 1 <1%
Unknown 176 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 35 19%
Other 21 12%
Student > Master 17 9%
Student > Bachelor 15 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 8%
Other 38 21%
Unknown 41 23%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 25 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 22 12%
Computer Science 11 6%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 9 5%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 5%
Other 55 30%
Unknown 50 28%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 29. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 July 2022.
All research outputs
#1,379,902
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Urology
#24
of 857 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,547
of 239,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Urology
#1
of 9 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 857 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 239,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 9 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them