↓ Skip to main content

Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence?

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Veterinary Research, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (88th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (95th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
19 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
212 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
557 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Antimicrobial drug use in food-producing animals and associated human health risks: what, and how strong, is the evidence?
Published in
BMC Veterinary Research, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12917-017-1131-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Karin Hoelzer, Nora Wong, Joe Thomas, Kathy Talkington, Elizabeth Jungman, Allan Coukell

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 19 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 557 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 557 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 78 14%
Student > Ph. D. Student 74 13%
Researcher 68 12%
Student > Bachelor 58 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 35 6%
Other 89 16%
Unknown 155 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 92 17%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 82 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 41 7%
Immunology and Microbiology 35 6%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 6%
Other 87 16%
Unknown 188 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 18. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 October 2019.
All research outputs
#2,079,098
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Veterinary Research
#120
of 3,350 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#38,586
of 329,636 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Veterinary Research
#5
of 105 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 91st percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,350 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,636 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 88% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 105 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.