You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Early mobilization of patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation: a retrospective cohort study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc13746 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Darryl Abrams, Jeffrey Javidfar, Erica Farrand, Linda B Mongero, Cara L Agerstrand, Patrick Ryan, David Zemmel, Keri Galuskin, Theresa M Morrone, Paul Boerem, Matthew Bacchetta, Daniel Brodie |
| Abstract |
Critical illness is a well-recognized cause of neuromuscular weakness and impaired physical functioning. Physical therapy (PT) has been demonstrated to be safe and effective for critically ill patients. The impact of such an intervention on patients receiving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) has not been well characterized. We describe the feasibility and impact of active PT on ECMO patients. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 33 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 8 | 24% |
| United Kingdom | 7 | 21% |
| Canada | 2 | 6% |
| Italy | 2 | 6% |
| United Arab Emirates | 1 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 3% |
| Norway | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 11 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 23 | 70% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 4 | 12% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 9% |
| Scientists | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 2 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 254 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 4 | 2% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 247 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 34 | 13% |
| Researcher | 25 | 10% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 22 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 22 | 9% |
| Other | 68 | 27% |
| Unknown | 61 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 89 | 35% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 47 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 19 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Engineering | 3 | 1% |
| Other | 17 | 7% |
| Unknown | 74 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 22. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 November 2023.
All research outputs
#1,723,513
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#1,522
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#17,102
of 235,878 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#6
of 146 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,878 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 146 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.