↓ Skip to main content

Prognostic factors in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study of a prospective observational cohort

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pulmonary Medicine, May 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (54th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Readers on

mendeley
130 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Prognostic factors in hospitalized community-acquired pneumonia: a retrospective study of a prospective observational cohort
Published in
BMC Pulmonary Medicine, May 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12890-017-0424-4
Pubmed ID
Authors

Akihiro Ito, Tadashi Ishida, Hironobu Tokumasu, Yasuyoshi Washio, Akio Yamazaki, Yuhei Ito, Hiromasa Tachibana

Abstract

To date, only few studies have examined the prognostic factors of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) defined according to the latest criteria, which excludes healthcare-associated pneumonia (HCAP). Therefore, we aimed to investigate the factors that affect prognosis, and evaluate the usefulness of existing pneumonia severity scores for predicting the prognosis of CAP. We retrospectively analyzed patients with CAP, excluding HCAP, who were enrolled prospectively between April 2007 and February 2016. Four patients who used macrolides other than azithromycin (AZM) were excluded. We used age, sex, comorbidities, laboratory findings and antimicrobial therapy as prognostic variables. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality and secondary outcome was ICU admission. We also performed receiver operating characteristic curve analysis of Pneumonia Severity Index (PSI), Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA)/American Thoracic Society (ATS) severe criteria, CURB-65 and A-DROP pneumonia severity scores. Among 1834 CAP patients, mean age was 73.5 ± 14.3 years; 1281 (69.8%) were men; and 30-day mortality was 6.7% (122/1834). In total, 1830 patients were analyzed. Multivariate analysis identified age [Odds Ratio (OR): 1.04, 95% Confidence Interval (CI): 1.02-1.07], chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) [OR: 1.77, 95% CI: 1.13-2.76], malignancy (OR: 2.25, 95% CI: 1.25-4.06), body temperature (OR: 0.81, 95% CI: 0.67-0.99), respiratory rate (OR: 1.04, 95% CI: 1.01-1.07), PaO2/FiO2 ≤ 250 (OR: 3.15, 95% CI: 1.93-5.14), Alb (OR: 0.27, 95% CI: 0.19-0.39), BUN (OR: 1.01, 95% CI: 1.00-1.02), and mechanical ventilation (OR: 2.99, 95% CI: 1.75-5.12) as prognostic factors. AZM and β-lactam combination therapy significantly reduced 30-day mortality (OR: 0.50, 95% CI: 0.26-0.97). Areas under the curve of PSI, IDSA/ATS severe criteria, CURB-65 and A-DROP were 0.759, 0.746, 0.754 and 0.764, respectively. Increasing age, presence of COPD and malignancy as comorbidities, hypothermia, tachypnea, PaO2/FiO2 ratio ≤250 mmHg, low Alb level, high BUN level and mechanical ventilatory support predict a worse prognosis; AZM combination therapy should be considered for CAP, excluding HCAP. All four pneumonia severity scores are useful for assessing the severity of CAP defined by the latest criteria. UMIN-CTR UMIN000004353 . Registered 7 October 2010. Retrospectively registered.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 130 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 130 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Other 19 15%
Researcher 17 13%
Student > Master 14 11%
Student > Bachelor 11 8%
Student > Postgraduate 6 5%
Other 17 13%
Unknown 46 35%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 46 35%
Nursing and Health Professions 12 9%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 5 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 2%
Other 10 8%
Unknown 52 40%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 December 2022.
All research outputs
#13,795,262
of 23,383,275 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#802
of 1,976 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,009
of 311,787 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pulmonary Medicine
#16
of 35 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,383,275 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,976 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 311,787 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 46th percentile – i.e., 46% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 35 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.