↓ Skip to main content

TnseqDiff: identification of conditionally essential genes in transposon sequencing studies

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Bioinformatics, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
95 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
TnseqDiff: identification of conditionally essential genes in transposon sequencing studies
Published in
BMC Bioinformatics, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s12859-017-1745-2
Pubmed ID
Authors

Lili Zhao, Mark T. Anderson, Weisheng Wu, Harry L. T. Mobley, Michael A. Bachman

Abstract

Tn-Seq is a high throughput technique for analysis of transposon mutant libraries to determine conditional essentiality of a gene under an experimental condition. A special feature of the Tn-seq data is that multiple mutants in a gene provides independent evidence to prioritize that gene as being essential. The existing methods do not account for this feature or rely on a high-density transposon library. Moreover, these methods are unable to accommodate complex designs. The method proposed here is specifically designed for the analysis of Tn-Seq data. It utilizes two steps to estimate the conditional essentiality for each gene in the genome. First, it collects evidence of conditional essentiality for each insertion by comparing read counts of that insertion between conditions. Second, it combines insertion-level evidence for the corresponding gene. It deals with data from both low- and high-density transposon libraries and accommodates complex designs. Moreover, it is very fast to implement. The performance of the proposed method was tested on simulated data and experimental Tn-Seq data from Serratia marcescens transposon mutant library used to identify genes that contribute to fitness in a murine model of infection. We describe a new, efficient method for identifying conditionally essential genes in Tn-Seq experiments with high detection sensitivity and specificity. It is implemented as TnseqDiff function in R package Tnseq and can be installed from the Comprehensive R Archive Network, CRAN.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 95 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 95 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 28%
Researcher 15 16%
Student > Bachelor 14 15%
Student > Master 10 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 6%
Other 9 9%
Unknown 14 15%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 32 34%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 19 20%
Immunology and Microbiology 15 16%
Computer Science 3 3%
Mathematics 2 2%
Other 7 7%
Unknown 17 18%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 November 2017.
All research outputs
#15,145,965
of 23,295,606 outputs
Outputs from BMC Bioinformatics
#5,141
of 7,378 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#187,661
of 314,318 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Bioinformatics
#76
of 114 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,295,606 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,378 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 314,318 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 114 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.