You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Motivations and perceptions of community advisory boards in the ethics of medical research: the case of the Thai-Myanmar border
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Ethics, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1472-6939-15-12 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Khin Maung Lwin, Phaik Yeong Cheah, Phaik Kin Cheah, Nicholas J White, Nicholas P J Day, Francois Nosten, Michael Parker |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 3 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 98 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 1% |
| Sierra Leone | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 96 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 15 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 13 | 13% |
| Other | 8 | 8% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 5% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 21 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 25 | 26% |
| Social Sciences | 21 | 21% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 3% |
| Philosophy | 3 | 3% |
| Other | 18 | 18% |
| Unknown | 20 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,810,483
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#811
of 1,121 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#127,536
of 242,398 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#16
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,121 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 242,398 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 45th percentile – i.e., 45% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.