You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Understanding diagnosis and management of dementia and guideline implementation in general practice: a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-5908-9-31 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kerry Murphy, Denise A O’Connor, Colette J Browning, Simon D French, Susan Michie, Jill J Francis, Grant M Russell, Barbara Workman, Leon Flicker, Martin P Eccles, Sally E Green |
| Abstract |
Dementia is a growing problem, causing substantial burden for patients, their families, and society. General practitioners (GPs) play an important role in diagnosing and managing dementia; however, there are gaps between recommended and current practice. The aim of this study was to explore GPs' reported practice in diagnosing and managing dementia and to describe, in theoretical terms, the proposed explanations for practice that was and was not consistent with evidence-based guidelines. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 29% |
| Portugal | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 4 | 57% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 57% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 14% |
| Scientists | 1 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 276 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 1% |
| Australia | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 272 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 52 | 19% |
| Researcher | 43 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 38 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 15 | 5% |
| Other | 56 | 20% |
| Unknown | 51 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Psychology | 67 | 24% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 27 | 10% |
| Social Sciences | 22 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 7 | 3% |
| Other | 45 | 16% |
| Unknown | 60 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 March 2016.
All research outputs
#7,196,997
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#1,210
of 1,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,615
of 221,905 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#25
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,721 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one is in the 28th percentile – i.e., 28% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,905 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 26th percentile – i.e., 26% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.