The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Synthesis and biological evaluation of lycorine derivatives as dual inhibitors of humanacetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chemistry Central Journal, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-153x-6-96 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yue-Hu Wang, Qin-Li Wan, Cheng-Ding Gu, Huai-Rong Luo, Chun-Lin Long |
Mendeley readers
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 6 | 20% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Researcher | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 20% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 6 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 5 | 17% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 5 | 17% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#4,449,502
of 25,986,827 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry Central Journal
#1
of 1 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#31,000
of 188,606 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry Central Journal
#5
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,986,827 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one scored the same or higher as 0 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 188,606 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.