You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Synthesis and biological evaluation of lycorine derivatives as dual inhibitors of humanacetylcholinesterase and butyrylcholinesterase
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Chemistry Central Journal, September 2012
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1752-153x-6-96 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Yue-Hu Wang, Qin-Li Wan, Cheng-Ding Gu, Huai-Rong Luo, Chun-Lin Long |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 10% |
| Researcher | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 6 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Chemistry | 6 | 20% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 20% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 3 | 10% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 10% |
| Chemical Engineering | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 26 January 2023.
All research outputs
#3,850,820
of 23,373,475 outputs
Outputs from Chemistry Central Journal
#91
of 561 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#26,891
of 170,103 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Chemistry Central Journal
#8
of 47 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,373,475 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 561 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 170,103 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 47 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.