You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Regeneration and transformation of Crambe abyssinica
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Plant Biology, September 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12870-014-0235-1 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Weicong Qi, Iris EM Tinnenbroek-Capel, Jan G Schaart, Bangquan Huang, Jihua Cheng, Richard GF Visser, Eibertus N Van Loo, Frans A Krens |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 39 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 23% |
| Researcher | 8 | 20% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 10% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 4 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 10% |
| Other | 5 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 21 | 53% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 7 | 18% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 5% |
| Engineering | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 May 2015.
All research outputs
#5,684,694
of 22,985,065 outputs
Outputs from BMC Plant Biology
#411
of 3,279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#55,125
of 238,504 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Plant Biology
#8
of 62 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,985,065 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 75th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,279 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 238,504 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 62 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.