You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The diagnostic validity of musculoskeletal ultrasound in lateral epicondylalgia: a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Medical Imaging, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1471-2342-14-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Valentin C Dones, Karen Grimmer, Kerry Thoirs, Consuelo G Suarez, Julie Luker |
| Abstract |
Ultrasound is considered a reliable, widely available, non-invasive and inexpensive imaging technique for assessing soft tissue involvement in Lateral epicondylalgia. Despite the number of diagnostic studies for Lateral Epicondylalgia, there is no consensus in the current literature on the best abnormal ultrasound findings that confirm lateral epicondylalgia. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 23 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 6 | 26% |
| United States | 3 | 13% |
| Canada | 2 | 9% |
| France | 1 | 4% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 22 | 96% |
| Scientists | 1 | 4% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 159 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 1% |
| Spain | 2 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 154 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 38 | 24% |
| Student > Bachelor | 23 | 14% |
| Other | 12 | 8% |
| Researcher | 12 | 8% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 9 | 6% |
| Other | 26 | 16% |
| Unknown | 39 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 62 | 39% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 11 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 2 | 1% |
| Other | 9 | 6% |
| Unknown | 42 | 26% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 19. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 June 2016.
All research outputs
#1,741,949
of 23,806,312 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Imaging
#7
of 603 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#18,129
of 223,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Imaging
#2
of 11 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,806,312 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 92nd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 603 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 223,278 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 11 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.