You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Learning a locomotor task: with or without errors?
|
---|---|
Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-11-25 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Laura Marchal–Crespo, Jasmin Schneider, Lukas Jaeger, Robert Riener |
Abstract |
Robotic haptic guidance is the most commonly used robotic training strategy to reduce performance errors while training. However, research on motor learning has emphasized that errors are a fundamental neural signal that drive motor adaptation. Thus, researchers have proposed robotic therapy algorithms that amplify movement errors rather than decrease them. However, to date, no study has analyzed with precision which training strategy is the most appropriate to learn an especially simple task. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 1 | 20% |
France | 1 | 20% |
United Kingdom | 1 | 20% |
Unknown | 2 | 40% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
Scientists | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 103 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Switzerland | 2 | 2% |
Italy | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 100 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 16% |
Student > Master | 15 | 15% |
Researcher | 10 | 10% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 10% |
Professor | 7 | 7% |
Other | 20 | 19% |
Unknown | 25 | 24% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 32 | 31% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 10 | 10% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 8 | 8% |
Psychology | 6 | 6% |
Sports and Recreations | 5 | 5% |
Other | 13 | 13% |
Unknown | 29 | 28% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 April 2014.
All research outputs
#7,441,384
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#494
of 1,278 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#73,669
of 221,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#5
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,278 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.