↓ Skip to main content

Patient-reported disease knowledge and educational needs in Lynch syndrome: findings of an interactive multidisciplinary patient conference

Overview of attention for article published in Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, February 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Among the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#46 of 260)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (78th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (85th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
18 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
56 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Patient-reported disease knowledge and educational needs in Lynch syndrome: findings of an interactive multidisciplinary patient conference
Published in
Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice, February 2014
DOI 10.1186/1897-4287-12-1
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sarah A Bannon, Maureen Mork, Eduardo Vilar, Susan K Peterson, Karen Lu, Patrick M Lynch, Miguel A Rodriguez-Bigas, YiQian Nancy You

Abstract

Patients with Lynch Syndrome, the most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome, benefit from genetic education and family counseling regarding diagnostic testing and cancer surveillance/prevention recommendations. Although genetic counseling is currently the most common venue where such education and counseling takes place, little is known about the level of disease knowledge and education needs as directly reported by patients and families with Lynch Syndrome. Furthermore, experiences with forums for larger-scale knowledge transfer have been limited in the current literature.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 56 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 1 2%
Unknown 55 98%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 14 25%
Researcher 6 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 6 11%
Student > Bachelor 5 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 4 7%
Other 9 16%
Unknown 12 21%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 17 30%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 16%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 7 13%
Nursing and Health Professions 5 9%
Computer Science 1 2%
Other 4 7%
Unknown 13 23%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 15 December 2017.
All research outputs
#6,495,686
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#46
of 260 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,455
of 322,628 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Hereditary Cancer in Clinical Practice
#1
of 7 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 260 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 322,628 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 78% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 7 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them