You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The effect of impedance-controlled robotic gait training on walking ability and quality in individuals with chronic incomplete spinal cord injury: an explorative study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1743-0003-11-26 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Bertine M Fleerkotte, Bram Koopman, Jaap H Buurke, Edwin H F van Asseldonk, Herman van der Kooij, Johan S Rietman |
| Abstract |
There is increasing interest in the use of robotic gait-training devices in walking rehabilitation of incomplete spinal cord injured (iSCI) individuals. These devices provide promising opportunities to increase the intensity of training and reduce physical demands on therapists. Despite these potential benefits, robotic gait-training devices have not yet demonstrated clear advantages over conventional gait-training approaches, in terms of functional outcomes. This might be due to the reduced active participation and step-to-step variability in most robotic gait-training strategies, when compared to manually assisted therapy. Impedance-controlled devices can increase active participation and step-to-step variability. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of impedance-controlled robotic gait training on walking ability and quality in chronic iSCI individuals. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 297 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 2 | <1% |
| Canada | 2 | <1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| Brazil | 1 | <1% |
| China | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 287 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 58 | 20% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 47 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 44 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 16 | 5% |
| Researcher | 14 | 5% |
| Other | 45 | 15% |
| Unknown | 73 | 25% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 75 | 25% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 54 | 18% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 10% |
| Sports and Recreations | 12 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 25 | 8% |
| Unknown | 90 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 March 2014.
All research outputs
#20,656,820
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#1,091
of 1,413 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#174,170
of 236,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
#28
of 34 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,413 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 34 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 5th percentile – i.e., 5% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.