You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Cell cycle, oncogenic and tumor suppressor pathways regulate numerous long and macro non-protein-coding RNAs
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Genome Biology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/gb-2014-15-3-r48 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jörg Hackermüller, Kristin Reiche, Christian Otto, Nadine Hösler, Conny Blumert, Katja Brocke-Heidrich, Levin Böhlig, Anne Nitsche, Katharina Kasack, Peter Ahnert, Wolfgang Krupp, Kurt Engeland, Peter F Stadler, Friedemann Horn |
| Abstract |
The genome is pervasively transcribed but most transcripts do not code for proteins, constituting non-protein coding RNAs. Despite increasing numbers of functional reports of individual long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs), assessing the extent of functionality among the non-coding transcriptional output of mammalian cells remains intricate. In the protein coding world, transcripts differentially expressed in the context of processes essential for the survival of multicellular organisms have been instrumental for the discovery of functionally relevant proteins and their deregulation is frequently associated with diseases. We therefore systematically identify lncRNAs expressed differentially in response to oncologically relevant processes, cell-cycle, p53-, and STAT3 pathway, using tiling arrays. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 4 | 33% |
| United States | 3 | 25% |
| Switzerland | 2 | 17% |
| France | 2 | 17% |
| Unknown | 1 | 8% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 6 | 50% |
| Members of the public | 5 | 42% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 80 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 1% |
| Mexico | 1 | 1% |
| Denmark | 1 | 1% |
| Namibia | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 75 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 27 | 34% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 14 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 12 | 15% |
| Professor | 7 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 13% |
| Unknown | 6 | 8% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 35 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 18 | 23% |
| Computer Science | 6 | 8% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 4 | 5% |
| Unknown | 9 | 11% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 60. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 November 2014.
All research outputs
#712,193
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Genome Biology
#462
of 4,467 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#6,610
of 236,028 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genome Biology
#8
of 65 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,467 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 27.6. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,028 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 65 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.