You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reliability of the Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) among radiation oncologists: an assessment of instability secondary to spinal metastases
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Radiation Oncology, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1748-717x-9-69 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Charles G Fisher, Rowan Schouten, Anne L Versteeg, Stefano Boriani, Peter Pal Varga, Laurence D Rhines, Norio Kawahara, Daryl Fourney, Lorna Weir, Jeremy J Reynolds, Arjun Sahgal, Michael G Fehlings, Ziya L Gokaslan |
| Abstract |
The Spinal Instability Neoplastic Score (SINS) categorizes tumor related spinal instability. It has the potential to streamline the referral of patients with established or potential spinal instability to a spine surgeon. This study aims to define the inter- and intra-observer reliability and validity of SINS among radiation oncologists. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Spain | 1 | 25% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | 25% |
| United States | 1 | 25% |
| Unknown | 1 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 3 | 75% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 25% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 104 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 99 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 18 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 12 | 12% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 12 | 12% |
| Researcher | 11 | 11% |
| Student > Master | 11 | 11% |
| Other | 27 | 26% |
| Unknown | 13 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 61 | 59% |
| Engineering | 5 | 5% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 3 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 26 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 18 March 2021.
All research outputs
#2,931,648
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from Radiation Oncology
#77
of 2,049 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#30,757
of 221,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Radiation Oncology
#4
of 59 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,049 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 59 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.