↓ Skip to main content

Erratum to: Do epinephrine auto-injectors have an unsuitable needle length in children and adolescents at risk for anaphylaxis from food allergy?

Overview of attention for article published in Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, July 2017
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#5 of 924)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (92nd percentile)

Mentioned by

news
52 news outlets
twitter
2 X users
googleplus
1 Google+ user

Citations

dimensions_citation
1 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
5 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Erratum to: Do epinephrine auto-injectors have an unsuitable needle length in children and adolescents at risk for anaphylaxis from food allergy?
Published in
Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology, July 2017
DOI 10.1186/s13223-017-0205-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sten Dreborg, Xia Wen, Laura Kim, Gina Tsai, Immaculate Nevis, Ryan Potts, Jack Chiu, Arunmozhi Dominic, Harold Kim

Abstract

[This corrects the article DOI: 10.1186/s13223-016-0110-8.].

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 5 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 5 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 2 40%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 20%
Other 1 20%
Researcher 1 20%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 2 40%
Chemical Engineering 1 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 1 20%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 415. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 November 2017.
All research outputs
#70,350
of 25,382,440 outputs
Outputs from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#5
of 924 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,574
of 325,442 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Allergy, Asthma & Clinical Immunology
#1
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,382,440 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 924 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 325,442 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.