↓ Skip to main content

Genome-wide association and genomic prediction for host response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection

Overview of attention for article published in Genetics Selection Evolution, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (68th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (81st percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
78 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
76 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Genome-wide association and genomic prediction for host response to porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome virus infection
Published in
Genetics Selection Evolution, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1297-9686-46-18
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nicholas J Boddicker, Angelica Bjorkquist, Raymond RR Rowland, Joan K Lunney, James M Reecy, Jack CM Dekkers

Abstract

Host genetics has been shown to play a role in porcine reproductive and respiratory syndrome (PRRS), which is the most economically important disease in the swine industry. A region on Sus scrofa chromosome (SSC) 4 has been previously reported to have a strong association with serum viremia and weight gain in pigs experimentally infected with the PRRS virus (PRRSV). The objective here was to identify haplotypes associated with the favorable phenotype, investigate additional genomic regions associated with host response to PRRSV, and to determine the predictive ability of genomic estimated breeding values (GEBV) based on the SSC4 region and based on the rest of the genome. Phenotypic data and 60 K SNP genotypes from eight trials of ~200 pigs from different commercial crosses were used to address these objectives.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 3%
Unknown 74 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 22%
Researcher 17 22%
Student > Master 8 11%
Student > Doctoral Student 5 7%
Other 3 4%
Other 9 12%
Unknown 17 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 33 43%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 8 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 7 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 4%
Unspecified 2 3%
Other 3 4%
Unknown 20 26%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2017.
All research outputs
#7,959,162
of 25,368,786 outputs
Outputs from Genetics Selection Evolution
#271
of 822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#71,913
of 236,023 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Genetics Selection Evolution
#3
of 16 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,368,786 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.1. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 65% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,023 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 16 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.