You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Use of prehospital ultrasound in North America: a survey of emergency medical services medical directors
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Emergency Medicine, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1471-227x-14-6 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
John Taylor, Kyle McLaughlin, Andrew McRae, Eddy Lang, Andrew Anton |
Abstract |
Advances in ultrasound imaging technology have made it more accessible to prehospital providers. Little is known about how ultrasound is being used in the prehospital environment and we suspect that it is not widely used in North America at this time. We believe that EMS system characteristics such as provider training, system size, population served, and type of transport will be associated with use or non-use of ultrasound. Our study objective was to describe the current use of prehospital ultrasound in North America. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 14 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United States | 4 | 29% |
United Kingdom | 2 | 14% |
Netherlands | 1 | 7% |
Malaysia | 1 | 7% |
Chile | 1 | 7% |
Australia | 1 | 7% |
Unknown | 4 | 29% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 7 | 50% |
Members of the public | 5 | 36% |
Scientists | 2 | 14% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 182 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
Spain | 1 | <1% |
United States | 1 | <1% |
South Africa | 1 | <1% |
Unknown | 178 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Bachelor | 32 | 18% |
Student > Master | 27 | 15% |
Researcher | 24 | 13% |
Other | 20 | 11% |
Student > Postgraduate | 14 | 8% |
Other | 37 | 20% |
Unknown | 28 | 15% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 99 | 54% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 18 | 10% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 3% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 3 | 2% |
Computer Science | 3 | 2% |
Other | 14 | 8% |
Unknown | 40 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,511,629
of 25,247,212 outputs
Outputs from BMC Emergency Medicine
#88
of 865 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#24,423
of 229,383 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Emergency Medicine
#2
of 5 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,247,212 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 865 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 229,383 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than 3 of them.