You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Effectiveness of skin-to-skin contact versus care-as-usual in mothers and their full-term infants: study protocol for a parallel-group randomized controlled trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Pediatrics, July 2017
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12887-017-0906-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kelly H. M. Cooijmans, Roseriet Beijers, Anne C. Rovers, Carolina de Weerth |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 17% |
| Canada | 1 | 17% |
| Ireland | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 67% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 2 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 599 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 599 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 81 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 74 | 12% |
| Researcher | 55 | 9% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 45 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 39 | 7% |
| Other | 90 | 15% |
| Unknown | 215 | 36% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 97 | 16% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 91 | 15% |
| Psychology | 66 | 11% |
| Neuroscience | 20 | 3% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 16 | 3% |
| Other | 72 | 12% |
| Unknown | 237 | 40% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 37. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 May 2020.
All research outputs
#1,120,276
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pediatrics
#100
of 3,515 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#22,136
of 329,721 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pediatrics
#5
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 95th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,515 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 329,721 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.