You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Baccalaureate nursing Students’ perspectives on learning about caring in China: a qualitative descriptive study
|
---|---|
Published in |
BMC Medical Education, March 2014
|
DOI | 10.1186/1472-6920-14-42 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Fang Ma, Jiping Li, Hongmin Liang, Yangjuan Bai, Jianhua Song |
Abstract |
The need to provide humanistic care in the contemporary healthcare system is more imperative now and the importance of cultivating caring in nursing education is urgent. Caring as the primary work of nursing has been discussed extensively, such as the meaning of caring, and teaching and learning strategies to improve nursing students' caring ability. Yet attempts to understand students' perspectives on learning about caring and to know their learning needs are seldom presented. The aim of this qualitative descriptive study was to explore the baccalaureate nursing students' perspectives on learning about caring in China. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 114 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 114 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 14% |
Student > Bachelor | 15 | 13% |
Student > Master | 14 | 12% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 14 | 12% |
Lecturer | 7 | 6% |
Other | 20 | 18% |
Unknown | 28 | 25% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 26% |
Social Sciences | 18 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 14% |
Psychology | 4 | 4% |
Computer Science | 3 | 3% |
Other | 9 | 8% |
Unknown | 34 | 30% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 March 2014.
All research outputs
#15,295,786
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Education
#2,257
of 3,301 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#131,264
of 221,286 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Education
#46
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,301 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,286 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.