You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Subclinical myocardial inflammation and diffuse fibrosis are common in systemic sclerosis – a clinical study using myocardial T1-mapping and extracellular volume quantification
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, March 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-16-21 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ntobeko AB Ntusi, Stefan K Piechnik, Jane M Francis, Vanessa M Ferreira, Aitzaz BS Rai, Paul M Matthews, Matthew D Robson, James Moon, Paul B Wordsworth, Stefan Neubauer, Theodoros D Karamitsos |
| Abstract |
Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is characterised by multi-organ tissue fibrosis including the myocardium. Diffuse myocardial fibrosis can be detected non-invasively by T1 and extracellular volume (ECV) quantification, while focal myocardial inflammation and fibrosis may be detected by T2-weighted and late gadolinium enhancement (LGE), respectively, using cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR). We hypothesised that multiparametric CMR can detect subclinical myocardial involvement in patients with SSc. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 3 | 43% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 14% |
| Unknown | 3 | 43% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 71% |
| Scientists | 2 | 29% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 188 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| Czechia | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 181 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 37 | 20% |
| Researcher | 29 | 15% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 20 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 9% |
| Other | 14 | 7% |
| Other | 43 | 23% |
| Unknown | 29 | 15% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 114 | 61% |
| Engineering | 9 | 5% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 3% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 4 | 2% |
| Unspecified | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Unknown | 42 | 22% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2014.
All research outputs
#7,915,082
of 25,728,855 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#611
of 1,386 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#70,645
of 236,770 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#5
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,728,855 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 68th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,386 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 236,770 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 64% of its contemporaries.