You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Reference values for isometric muscle force among workers for the Netherlands: a comparison of reference values
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation, February 2014
|
| DOI | 10.1186/2052-1847-6-10 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Rob KW Douma, Remko Soer, Wim P Krijnen, Michiel Reneman, Cees P van der Schans |
| Abstract |
Muscle force is important for daily life and sports and can be measured with a handheld dynamometer. Reference values are employed to quantify a subject's muscle force. It is not unambiguous whether reference values can be generalized to other populations. Objectives in this study were; first to confirm the reliability of the utilization of hand-held dynamometers for isometric strength measurement; second to determine reference values for a population of Dutch workers; third to compare these values with those of a USA population. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 2 | 25% |
| China | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 13% |
| Unknown | 3 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 8 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 189 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 187 | 99% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 39 | 21% |
| Student > Bachelor | 34 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 19 | 10% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 11 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 5% |
| Other | 31 | 16% |
| Unknown | 45 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 59 | 31% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 34 | 18% |
| Sports and Recreations | 14 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 3% |
| Neuroscience | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 20 | 11% |
| Unknown | 51 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 November 2022.
All research outputs
#6,814,754
of 24,871,735 outputs
Outputs from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#209
of 575 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,065
of 226,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Sports Science, Medicine and Rehabilitation
#7
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,871,735 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 575 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 63% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 226,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 50% of its contemporaries.