↓ Skip to main content

Factors associated with non-utilization of child immunization in Pakistan: evidence from the Demographic and Health Survey 2006-07

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (72nd percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (58th percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
82 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Factors associated with non-utilization of child immunization in Pakistan: evidence from the Demographic and Health Survey 2006-07
Published in
BMC Public Health, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1471-2458-14-232
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ayesha Siddiqa Bugvi, Rahla Rahat, Rubeena Zakar, Muhammad Zakria Zakar, Florian Fischer, Muazzam Nasrullah, Riffat Manawar

Abstract

The proportion of incompletely immunized children in Pakistan varies from 37-58%, and this has recently resulted in outbreaks of measles and polio. The aim of this paper is to determine the factors associated with incomplete immunization among children aged 12-23 months in Pakistan.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United Kingdom 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Unknown 270 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 58 21%
Lecturer 27 10%
Student > Bachelor 27 10%
Researcher 25 9%
Student > Postgraduate 18 7%
Other 32 12%
Unknown 86 32%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 61 22%
Medicine and Dentistry 57 21%
Social Sciences 17 6%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 6 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 2%
Other 30 11%
Unknown 97 36%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 August 2019.
All research outputs
#6,583,560
of 23,700,294 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#6,836
of 15,385 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#60,880
of 222,530 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#118
of 281 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,700,294 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 71st percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,385 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 55% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 222,530 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 281 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its contemporaries.