↓ Skip to main content

Indirect land use changes of biofuel production – a review of modelling efforts and policy developments in the European Union

Overview of attention for article published in Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (87th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (73rd percentile)

Mentioned by

policy
3 policy sources
twitter
3 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
106 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
185 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Indirect land use changes of biofuel production – a review of modelling efforts and policy developments in the European Union
Published in
Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1754-6834-7-35
Pubmed ID
Authors

Serina Ahlgren, Lorenzo Di Lucia

Abstract

The issue of indirect land use changes (ILUC) caused by the promotion of transport biofuels has attracted considerable attention in recent years. In this paper, we reviewed the current literature on modelling work to estimate emissions of greenhouse gases (GHG) caused by ILUC of biofuels. We also reviewed the development of ILUC policies in the EU. Our review of past modelling work revealed that most studies employ economic equilibrium modelling and focus on ethanol fuels, especially with maize as feedstock. It also revealed major variation in the results from the models, especially for biodiesel fuels. However, there has been some convergence of results over time, particularly for ethanol from maize, wheat and sugar cane. Our review of EU policy developments showed that the introduction of fuel-specific ILUC factors has been officially suggested by policymakers to deal with the ILUC of biofuels. The values proposed as ILUC factors in the policymaking process in the case of ethanol fuels are generally in line with the results of the latest modelling exercises, in particular for first-generation ethanol fuels from maize and sugar cane, while those for biodiesel fuels are somewhat higher. If the proposed values were introduced into EU policy, no (first-generation) biodiesel fuel would be able to comply with the EU GHG saving requirements. We identified a conflict between the demand from EU policymakers for exact, highly specific values and the capacity of the current models to supply results with that level of precision. We concluded that alternative policy approaches to ILUC factors should be further explored.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 185 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 2%
Indonesia 2 1%
United States 2 1%
South Africa 1 <1%
France 1 <1%
Unknown 176 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 46 25%
Student > Master 31 17%
Student > Ph. D. Student 21 11%
Student > Bachelor 10 5%
Other 8 4%
Other 22 12%
Unknown 47 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Environmental Science 45 24%
Engineering 22 12%
Social Sciences 12 6%
Energy 11 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 9 5%
Other 27 15%
Unknown 59 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 January 2020.
All research outputs
#3,026,493
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#140
of 1,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#29,438
of 235,794 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biotechnology for Biofuels and Bioproducts
#8
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,578 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 235,794 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its contemporaries.