↓ Skip to main content

Knowledge management for systems biology a general and visually driven framework applied to translational medicine

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Systems Biology, March 2011
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (83rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
6 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
42 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
186 Mendeley
citeulike
7 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Knowledge management for systems biology a general and visually driven framework applied to translational medicine
Published in
BMC Systems Biology, March 2011
DOI 10.1186/1752-0509-5-38
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dieter Maier, Wenzel Kalus, Martin Wolff, Susana G Kalko, Josep Roca, Igor Marin de Mas, Nil Turan, Marta Cascante, Francesco Falciani, Miguel Hernandez, Jordi Villà-Freixa, Sascha Losko

Abstract

To enhance our understanding of complex biological systems like diseases we need to put all of the available data into context and use this to detect relations, pattern and rules which allow predictive hypotheses to be defined. Life science has become a data rich science with information about the behaviour of millions of entities like genes, chemical compounds, diseases, cell types and organs, which are organised in many different databases and/or spread throughout the literature. Existing knowledge such as genotype-phenotype relations or signal transduction pathways must be semantically integrated and dynamically organised into structured networks that are connected with clinical and experimental data. Different approaches to this challenge exist but so far none has proven entirely satisfactory.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 186 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 6 3%
Brazil 3 2%
Spain 3 2%
United Kingdom 3 2%
Colombia 2 1%
Germany 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
South Africa 1 <1%
Sweden 1 <1%
Other 5 3%
Unknown 160 86%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 41 22%
Student > Ph. D. Student 34 18%
Student > Master 20 11%
Student > Bachelor 14 8%
Other 13 7%
Other 40 22%
Unknown 24 13%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Computer Science 43 23%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 38 20%
Medicine and Dentistry 21 11%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 13 7%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 5%
Other 35 19%
Unknown 26 14%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 August 2018.
All research outputs
#4,370,146
of 25,374,917 outputs
Outputs from BMC Systems Biology
#111
of 1,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#21,272
of 119,998 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Systems Biology
#3
of 18 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,917 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 82nd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,132 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 119,998 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 18 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.