↓ Skip to main content

Differential effect of wealth quintile on modern contraceptive use and fertility: evidence from Malawian women

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Women's Health, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
81 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
273 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Differential effect of wealth quintile on modern contraceptive use and fertility: evidence from Malawian women
Published in
BMC Women's Health, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1472-6874-14-40
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stephen A Adebowale, Sunday A Adedini, Latifat D Ibisomi, Martin E Palamuleni

Abstract

High fertility and wide inequality in wealth distribution are phenomenal problems in sub-Saharan Africa. Modern Contraceptives (MC) are useful for limiting fertility, but are not always easily accessible in Malawi. This study examines the gap in MC use and fertility between women in the richest and poorest Wealth Quintile (WQ).

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 273 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Indonesia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Ghana 1 <1%
Unknown 270 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 47 17%
Lecturer 30 11%
Researcher 29 11%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 7%
Student > Bachelor 18 7%
Other 46 17%
Unknown 84 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 53 19%
Social Sciences 44 16%
Medicine and Dentistry 42 15%
Mathematics 8 3%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 7 3%
Other 27 10%
Unknown 92 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2014.
All research outputs
#17,715,061
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Women's Health
#1,398
of 1,795 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#153,626
of 221,149 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Women's Health
#38
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,795 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.7. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 221,149 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.