↓ Skip to main content

Update on nerve repair by biological tubulization*

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Citations

dimensions_citation
32 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
39 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Update on nerve repair by biological tubulization*
Published in
Journal of Brachial Plexus and Peripheral Nerve Injury, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/1749-7221-9-3
Pubmed ID
Authors

Stefano Geuna, Pierluigi Tos, Paolo Titolo, Davide Ciclamini, Teresa Beningo, Bruno Battiston

Abstract

Many surgical techniques are available for bridging peripheral nerve defects. Autologous nerve grafts are the current gold standard for most clinical conditions. In selected cases, alternative types of conduits can be used. Although most efforts are today directed towards the development of artificial synthetic nerve guides, the use of non-nervous autologous tissue-based conduits (biological tubulization) can still be considered a valuable alternative to nerve autografts. In this paper we will overview the advancements in biological tubulization of nerve defects, with either mono-component or multiple-component autotransplants, with a special focus on the use of a vein segment filled with skeletal muscle fibers, a technique that has been widely investigated in our laboratory and that has already been successfully introduced in the clinical practice.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 39 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Malaysia 1 3%
Portugal 1 3%
Unknown 37 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 9 23%
Student > Ph. D. Student 8 21%
Student > Postgraduate 3 8%
Researcher 3 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 5%
Other 7 18%
Unknown 7 18%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 10 26%
Neuroscience 6 15%
Engineering 4 10%
Materials Science 4 10%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 5%
Other 3 8%
Unknown 10 26%