↓ Skip to main content

Rehabilitating drug-induced long-QT promoters: In-silico design of hERG-neutral cisapride analogues with retained pharmacological activity

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, March 2014
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Readers on

mendeley
35 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Rehabilitating drug-induced long-QT promoters: In-silico design of hERG-neutral cisapride analogues with retained pharmacological activity
Published in
BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology, March 2014
DOI 10.1186/2050-6511-15-14
Pubmed ID
Authors

Serdar Durdagi, Trevor Randall, Henry J Duff, Adam Chamberlin, Sergei Y Noskov

Abstract

The human ether-a-go-go related gene 1 (hERG1), which codes for a potassium ion channel, is a key element in the cardiac delayed rectified potassium current, IKr, and plays an important role in the normal repolarization of the heart's action potential. Many approved drugs have been withdrawn from the market due to their prolongation of the QT interval. Most of these drugs have high potencies for their principal targets and are often irreplaceable, thus "rehabilitation" studies for decreasing their high hERG1 blocking affinities, while keeping them active at the binding sites of their targets, have been proposed to enable these drugs to re-enter the market.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 35 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Turkey 2 6%
United Kingdom 1 3%
Austria 1 3%
Unknown 31 89%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 8 23%
Student > Master 7 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 5 14%
Researcher 4 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 3 9%
Other 4 11%
Unknown 4 11%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 6 17%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 4 11%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 9%
Computer Science 3 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 3 9%
Other 14 40%
Unknown 2 6%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 30 June 2014.
All research outputs
#18,366,246
of 22,747,498 outputs
Outputs from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#311
of 439 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#160,703
of 220,953 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Pharmacology and Toxicology
#12
of 14 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,747,498 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 439 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.3. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 220,953 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 14 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.